A year ago, on May 8, 2024, I authored an X thread, "How America falls," which addressed a question many in the United States and the West were then—and still are—properly asking:
How was it possible for the far-left to seize control of nearly every institution at the core of our civil society?
It remains a vital question.
It is equally important, as we proceed with attempting to reverse these losses, that we answer this question with great accuracy and specificity for the following reason: In answering this important question, we can begin to address the deficiencies that—let's be honest—came dangerously close to collapsing the nation and the West at large.
A year later, of course, the state of affairs looks more promising. The basis for optimism is almost entirely attributable to President Donald Trump’s resilience and persistence throughout the 2024 presidential election cycle, which culminated with his electrifying November 5 victory, in which he won the Electoral College convincingly, 312 to 226, and was the first Republican presidential candidate in two decades to win the popular vote, securing over 77 million votes, over 2 million more than Kamala Harris.
Call this a mandate—and we must act with urgency on it.
But imagine the state of the world and nation had Trump, for whatever reason (lawfare, voter fraud, or simple electoral defeat), fallen short.
Now is an ideal time for us to perform a thorough assessment of how the ascent of the far-left nearly captured this nation and could again if we are not taking responsive and corrective steps in response to these significant losses.
What follows, with a few edits, is what I wrote a year ago about this:
Unlike conservatism, Marxism and Maoism are totalitarian ideologies that place significant emphasis on operational tactics, which is necessary because they rely on a small but highly disciplined minority to impose their alien agenda on a vastly larger majority that they intuitively know rejects it. We must concede the obvious: They have enjoyed great success in doing just this.
Seldom noted, however, is this fact:
As they have gone about successfully advancing their alien ideology, the far-left also has been simultaneously assessing and testing the resolve of this vastly larger centrist and conservative majority they oppose—and the political party (the Republican National Committee) and various well-funded organizations, advocacy groups, and think tanks that purport to represent it.
So, for instance, the far-left has asked:
1. What would the Republican and conservative establishment do if we actually manipulated a presidential election and installed an illegitimate president in their great nation?
Answer: As they saw, not much. In fact, the Republican National Committee and its affiliates, which had the most resources to assess and document fraud and irregularities in the 2020 presidential election, has to this day still not affirmed Biden's illegitimacy, despite the fact that a sizable majority of registered Republicans have acknowledged it. Nor have the lion's share of large conservative institutions or most conservative media documented or acknowledged this fact. It is unsettling, but it is a reality we largely allowed.
2. What would the Republican and conservative establishment do if we fully opened the borders to their great nation and began using every governmental and global resource available to import millions of illegal aliens, including foreign agents, terrorists, cartel and gang leaders, and violent criminals?
Answer: As they saw, not much. Sure, the GOP and conservative organizations predictably used it as a successful fundraising mechanism. Sure, they commented on its outrageousness. But no coherent plan emerged to stop it. It is unsettling, but it is a reality we largely allowed.
3. What would the Republican and conservative establishment do if we handed Afghanistan, where over 2,400 American heroes were killed over the 20-year post-9/11 war on terror, right back to the terrorist Taliban?
Answer: As they saw, nothing. It is unsettling, but it is a reality we largely allowed.
These are just three examples of conservative and centrist inaction and failure on a seemingly unlimited list of such disengaged defeats. The point is this: At every step, the far-left has not just succeeded; they have succeeded with relative ease, which is immensely dangerous for two reasons:
First, obviously, they have made enormous, impressive, and expeditious progress in advancing their ambitious and alien agenda.
But second and less noted, the ease with which they secured these victories has left them increasingly brazen, emboldened, optimistic, energized, and inspired to persist in their grand quest: Taking down the freest, wealthiest, and most powerful nation in world history.
How an ideological minority prevails
How is it possible for such a small number of hardened ideologues with the most alien and unappealing ideals to succeed in imposing their will on the vast majority of Americans who clearly oppose them?
It is not attributable to the far-left's size or their power of persuasion, both of which are unimpressive. Rather, it is because they have assembled and embraced operational discipline and basic leadership traits, including collaboration, strategic planning, unity, unyielding focus, boldness, relentless diligence, and accountability for results. The conservative and centrist movements, conversely, have not.
A history of common denominators
In their most graphic forms, history is filled with examples of how the far-left has secured power over larger centrist and conservative majorities in their respective nations.
It all began with the October Revolution of 1917. It continued with the Chinese Communist Revolution in 1949, the communist revolution in Cuba in 1959, the communist Sandinista revolution in Nicaragua in 1979, and similar totalitarian communist power grabs.
Importantly, in each of these and others, there are several common denominators employed by the communist left that may appear familiar to those who have watched the rapid and seemingly unchallenged ascent of the far-left in the West in recent years:
Each revolutionary force promised the people a better life and represented that they spoke for the downtrodden. Once they obtained power, however, these promises were quickly abandoned, and the plight of the poor universally worsened under their governance;
Each sought to persuade citizens to distance themselves from tradition and even feel guilt over such traditions. They viewed the family, churches, education, and other traditional institutions as enemies, and quickly eradicated or replaced them with revolutionary substitutes;
Each ultimately obtained power through deception. They concealed their communist, militant, and extremist ideological inclinations, and even disavowed such labels until they assumed power and became glaringly obvious; and
Once assuming power, each sought to monopolize power at all levels of society, outlawing, eliminating, or taking control of all aspects of society, including churches, media, non-profit organizations, education, private enterprise, and other institutions that typically operate outside of political or government control.
Chronicling America's demise is not leadership
Conversely, over the past few decades, especially in the post-Reagan era, our nation's conservative movement and Republican establishment have been engaged in almost uniformly performative and reactive undertakings, largely chronicling America's demise—writing books, hosting television shows and podcasts, giving lectures, and the like in which they largely document our defeats. While it has brought a good number of conservatives some degree of wealth and fame, it never represented a serious macro-level plan for halting the advance of this smaller but vastly better disciplined radical movement, which saw these deficiencies and set about swiftly seizing control of nearly every institution at the core of civil society.
Time for assessment and overhaul
One conclusion should be obvious to all: We cannot go forward with the same tactics and leadership deficiencies and expect a different outcome. We are now at a historical crossroads that demands a sustainable conservative and centrist movement that is not designed to narrate our nation's demise, but is accountable for and focused on its comeback.
None of us can accomplish this grand undertaking in isolation. It must be a collaborative undertaking. We also must keep score and hold those responsible to account for incremental and overall outcomes, which to date we have failed to do.
The past few decades have proven that populist movements, including the Tea Party and MAGA movements, can successfully alter the nation's political direction, but these successes need to be institutionalized.
We also should reject the notion that there is anything particularly new about the magnitude of this undertaking. In fact, from the first bullets at Lexington and Concord on April 19, 1775, the common theme of the nation's history has been the great challenges and threats we have confronted.
The nation's survival is now on the line, but this has been the case many times before. It is a testament to American greatness that, in their respective eras, each generation before ours has united to successfully ensure the preservation of American freedom and sovereignty.
This generation cannot shrink from this challenge. Saving the nation at this point is an undertaking that should not be underestimated; it is going to be difficult and complex. But reclaiming it once it once it is gone will prove vastly more so.